Months following the rapid rebel offensive led by Islamists that toppled Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Syria continues to be a nation in crisis. The recently formed transitional administration, under the leadership of Ahmad al-Sharaa, is facing increasing security issues, with violent opposition from remaining Assad supporters. Although the breakdown of Assad’s repressive government was a significant milestone in Syria’s 13-year civil war, achieving lasting peace and stability is turning out to be extremely complex.
The transitional administration, mainly made up of individuals who gained recognition from opposition hubs such as Idlib in the northwest, has taken over a fragmented nation ravaged by prolonged conflict. The dismantling of Assad-era institutions, including the military and the Baath Party, has resulted in the displacement of hundreds of thousands of former regime officials and allies. A significant number of these individuals have declined to make peace with the new administration, sparking unrest that jeopardizes the stability of the delicate government.
A persistent danger from Assad supporters
In the periods following Assad’s exit, his supporters have become a major rebel force. These leftovers of the former regime, many deeply rooted in Syria’s military, intelligence, and political structures, have utilized their existing networks to coordinate armed opposition. This revolt has been especially active in the coastal regions of Latakia and Tartous, traditional strongholds of the Assad lineage and residence to a substantial portion of Syria’s Alawite minority.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights recently highlighted a fatal ambush in the province of Latakia, where gunmen attacked government troops trying to detain a former Assad official. This assault resulted in the deaths of at least 13 security members and sparked a surge of violence throughout the area. By the next day, confrontations had intensified, leading to more than 120 fatalities—a clear indication of the difficulties confronting the interim administration.
The Institute for the Study of War, a research body, has cautioned that Assad loyalists may constitute some of the most proficient insurgent groups in Syria. Their expertise in military strategy and capacity to exploit existing networks provide them with a tactical edge in orchestrating assaults against the new regime. For interim President Sharaa, this escalating insurgency is the primary hurdle to solidifying control and maintaining national security.
Escalating Strains in Alawite Areas
The rebel activities in Latakia and Tartous have exacerbated tensions between Syria’s Sunni-led transitional administration and the Alawite minority, a Shia branch that was the foundation of Assad’s regime. The Alawites, who had privileges and influence under Assad’s rule, have suffered considerable setbacks since its downfall. Many now feel sidelined and targeted, despite Sharaa’s promises that his government will honor Syria’s varied religious groups.
Recent accounts of aggression toward Alawite communities have heightened these tensions. Activists have alleged that armed groups associated with the government have killed numerous male residents in Alawite regions, an allegation yet to be independently confirmed but has nevertheless incited anger. These occurrences could potentially push more Alawites toward joining insurgent factions, complicating the government’s attempts to stabilize the area.
Recent reports of violence against Alawite communities have deepened these tensions. Activists have accused government-aligned gunmen of killing dozens of male residents in Alawite areas, a claim that has not been independently verified but has nonetheless sparked outrage. Such incidents risk driving more Alawites into the arms of insurgent groups, further complicating the government’s efforts to stabilize the region.
The situation in Syria’s south also remains precarious. While a deal was reached with Druze forces earlier this week to ease tensions, the government continues to face resistance from various factions across the country. With different regions controlled by competing groups backed by foreign powers, the interim administration’s authority is limited and fragmented.
The economic and diplomatic challenges ahead
Nonetheless, Western countries remain cautious about Sharaa’s objectives, with some doubting whether the new administration can genuinely distance itself from the repressive methods of the Assad era. This skepticism has hampered attempts to garner international backing, keeping Syria’s economy vulnerable. The interim administration’s capacity to rejuvenate the nation will hinge on its effectiveness in tackling both domestic security issues and foreign diplomatic obstacles.
A nation split
A country divided
For Sharaa, unifying the nation involves both gaining the people’s trust and overcoming the insurgent threat. His administration has urged former Assad security members to lay down arms and seek reconciliation, yet advancements have been sluggish. “We are monitoring everyone, but do not wish to give the impression of pursuing them,” stated a senior official in the transitional government. This careful strategy illustrates the delicate equilibrium the new leadership needs to maintain in their effort to restore order while avoiding the alienation of important population segments.
The Path Forward
The ousting of Bashar al-Assad was a pivotal moment in Syria’s history, yet the transition to peace and stability is riddled with challenges. From the insurgent dangers presented by Assad’s supporters to the profound splits among Syria’s religious and ethnic groups, the future remains uncertain. The interim administration must maneuver through these difficulties while attending to the urgent demands of a populace ravaged by over ten years of conflict.
Simultaneously, Syria’s leaders are under increasing international examination as they strive to remove sanctions and obtain the necessary support for reconstruction. For the transitional government, success will rely on effectively tackling the roots of unrest, promoting inclusivity, and showing a true dedication to moving away from the authoritarian practices of the past.
At the same time, Syria’s leaders face mounting international scrutiny as they seek to lift sanctions and secure the support needed to rebuild the country. For the transitional government, success will depend on its ability to address the root causes of unrest, foster inclusivity, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to breaking from the authoritarian practices of the past.
As clashes continue and tensions rise, Syria’s future hangs in the balance. The coming months will be critical for Sharaa’s government as it works to consolidate power, restore security, and lay the foundation for a more stable and prosperous nation.
