In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once supplied many jobs have vanished. Now, the county is labeled as a “food desert,” indicating residents are often distant from grocery stores. Acknowledging this challenge, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016, working with farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the area, where around 30% of the population is Black, and about 25% face poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“I was moved to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates what you do.”
Only two years ago, initiatives like this were extensively supported by leading businesses throughout the U.S., as the nation came to terms with systemic racism following the 2020 killing of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life under the knee of a police officer in Minneapolis.
Nonetheless, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these pledges. In November, Walmart revealed the cessation of certain diversity programs, which includes the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, a key player in funding the grant received by Ms. Ashby.
Firms like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have undertaken comparable actions, highlighting a more extensive corporate retraction from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This transition signifies a significant cultural change, influenced partly by concerns about legal disputes, regulatory oversight, and backlash on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since assuming office in January, Donald Trump has vigorously attempted to dismantle DEI programs, promoting a revival of “merit-based opportunity” within the United States. He has directed the federal government to abolish DEI initiatives and commence inquiries into private companies and educational establishments suspected of participating in “illegal DEI practices.”
Within the early months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs closed its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency placed nearly 200 civil rights employees on paid leave, and Trump dismissed the country’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary previously suggested he should be removed due to his association with “woke” DEI policies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Programs modeled after DEI initially gained traction in the United States during the 1960s, as a reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to enhance and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described with terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the systemic discrimination perpetuated under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to incorporate “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within businesses and government institutions, DEI efforts primarily targeted hiring strategies that portrayed diversity as a financial benefit. Supporters contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, though a significant focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The push for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter protests and escalating calls for social change. Walmart, for example, committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo hired its inaugural chief diversity officer, while firms like Google and Nike already had similar leadership positions established. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% filled by people of color, as reported by Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as rapidly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender lines.
More recently, critics have intensified their arguments that DEI efforts—originally designed to combat discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, particularly toward white Americans. Training sessions that highlight “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have drawn heavy criticism.
The roots of this opposition stem from conservative resistance to critical race theory (CRT), an academic framework that suggests racism is deeply embedded in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in schools evolved into broader efforts to penalize “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative figures such as Robby Starbuck have capitalized on this sentiment, targeting companies for their DEI initiatives. Starbuck has claimed responsibility for policy shifts at companies like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after exposing their DEI programs to his online followers.
A major and visible achievement for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for teaming up with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. The resulting calls to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to a Harvard Business Review analysis.
Another major turning point arrived in June 2023, when the Supreme Court ruled that race could no longer be a factor in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This ruling raised questions about the legal basis of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the decision, Meta notified employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before announcing the end of its own DEI initiatives.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI initiatives among large corporations prompts questions regarding the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit conducting surveys on workplace issues—suggests that numerous companies initially adopted DEI initiatives to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from an authentic commitment to change.
Nonetheless, not every company is succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation remarked that although DEI programs seem to be waning, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still incorporate DEI commitments within their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently voted to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public sentiment on DEI remains split. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has diminished, yet support for related topics—such as equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey discovered that a majority (56%) of working adults continue to perceive workplace DEI efforts as advantageous.
